AUTHOR: Jerry "Jet" Whittaker TITLE: A Common E-Wallet for the Online Poker Industry DATE: 10:09 AM ----- BODY: Is 24hPoker's move to a single e-wallet, which allows customers access to
more than one poker network, a recipe for success or an open door to leave
the network? 24hPoker, owner of the B2B/24hNetwork announced in November
2006 that they would offer their customers the option to use rival poker
networks through 24hPoker's e-wallet, a unique concept within the online
gaming industry. The first network that they have signed such an agreement
with is Boss Media's International Poker Network (IPN). The concept comes
from the founder and CEO Per Hildebrand, who in addition to his business
interests is also one of the most highly rated poker players in Sweden,
almost reaching the final table at the WSOP in 2005. His logic behind the
concept is that it is common practice for online poker players to play on
more than one site, with the average player using three to four different
sites. The problem with this practice is the need to transfer money from one
site to another, back and forth between the different networks. In theory
therefore, the common e-wallet will make it much easier for players that
choose to play on 24hPoker, in addition to other networks. But what are the
risks and what could be the potential benefits of such a service within the
industry?
A problem that the B2B poker network currently faces is that of having
sufficient player liquidity on the network. Since the mass withdrawal of the
industry from the United States in October 2006, online gaming has become a
much more competitive environment, particularly for the smaller poker
networks, as competing operators fight for a smaller pool of customers. By
allowing their players to play on different poker networks, the biggest risk
for 24hPoker is that the fragile level of liquidity may reduce as a result
of players using rival networks and possibly remaining on other networks,
which in turn could cause yet more players to leave in search of 'the
action'.
A benefit that 24hPoker can gain from the single e-wallet is from the
perception that it looks after its customers needs, which could improve
customer loyalty as well as generating referrals through word of mouth.
There is also the possibility that they will be able to generate additional
revenue from the fact that players are using their e-wallet rather than that
of their competitors. The common e-wallet was originally scheduled to launch
in January 2007 and although delayed, plans still seem to be on track for a
launch of the service in the near future. Only time will tell whether this
concept will pay off. There are many potential benefits, but with the
network facing liquidity issues at this time, this is both brave and
innovative, as well as a risky path for 24hPoker and the B2B poker network. --------